Feature: Onboarding #35
No reviewers
Labels
No labels
bug
code
docs
duplicate
enhancement
help wanted
invalid
question
styles
wontfix
No milestone
No project
No assignees
2 participants
Notifications
Due date
No due date set.
Dependencies
No dependencies set.
Reference
uwayss/muhsin!35
Loading…
Add table
Add a link
Reference in a new issue
No description provided.
Delete branch "feat/onboarding"
Deleting a branch is permanent. Although the deleted branch may continue to exist for a short time before it actually gets removed, it CANNOT be undone in most cases. Continue?
finally wuhuu
@ -20,0 +24,4 @@"stepLabel": "الخطوة {{current}} من {{total}}","welcomeTitle": "أهلًا بك في مُحْسِن","welcomeBody": "أجب عن هذين السؤالين وابدأ استخدام التطبيق","genderTitle": "الجنس، من فضلك؟",OH GOD I NEED TO RE-DO THE TRANSLATIONS LOL!
@claude i'm done with this branch but i might've missed something. Go ahead and take a look at the changes. Then give me a very very short and concise, direct verdict. Is it ready to be merged? What may I have missed?
All 8 finder agents have now reported. The headline finding: swiping past the Gender page bypasses the required-answer gate entirely (the gesture handler calls
onPageChangedirectly without checkingcanAdvance), letting users skip the very question commitbf0dce6says skipping was removed for. The code-review skill should now move into its verification phase — waiting for that to complete before I write the final reply.@claude okay i fixed that. do another check. don't use complex skills or subagents you can only send me one answer. just do one message.
All locales are consistent, lint and typecheck pass clean, and the swipe-gate fix (
bf1d15f) correctly caps both the live drag and the post-flick projection viamaxPage, with gender un-selectable back to null so the cap can't regress mid-flow. That closes the bug flagged earlier.Verdict: Ready to merge.
Nothing else jumped out. One minor thing worth a glance, not a blocker:
BackHandleronpage === 0returnsfalseto let the OS close the app — fine — but there's no hardware-back handling gate on the gender page itself, though that's moot since back only ever moves to a lower page number, never past the gate.No changes made to files this run.